Recital 95

Without prejudice to applicable Union law, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680, considering the intrusive nature of post-remote biometric identification systems, the use of post-remote biometric identification systems should be subject to safeguards. Post-remote biometric identification systems should always be used in a way that is proportionate, legitimate and strictly necessary, and thus targeted, in terms of the individuals to be identified, the location, temporal scope and based on a closed data set of legally acquired video footage. In any case, post-remote biometric identification systems should not be used in the framework of law enforcement to lead to indiscriminate surveillance. The conditions for post-remote biometric identification should in any case not provide a basis to circumvent the conditions of the prohibition and strict exceptions for real time remote biometric identification.

Zo­bacz ofi­cjal­ny tekst praw­ny w EUR-​Lex

Po­trze­bu­jesz po­mo­cy w po­ru­sza­niu się po AI Act?

Kla­de­ro Ci po­mo­że.

Skon­tak­tuj się

Kla­de­ro — part­ner w prak­tycz­nym wdra­ża­niu AI

Kla­de­ro po­ma­ga or­ga­ni­za­cjom prze­kształ­cać moż­li­wo­ści AI w uży­tecz­ne sys­te­my, od­po­wie­dzial­ne work­flow oraz wie­dzę po­trzeb­ną do ich spraw­nej ob­słu­gi.
Ofe­ru­je­my róż­no­rod­ne pro­duk­ty i usłu­gi — od roz­wo­ju i in­te­gra­cji AI po przy­go­to­wa­nie do AI Act oraz prak­tycz­ne szko­le­nia. Po­roz­ma­wiaj z nami, aby do­wie­dzieć się wię­cej.