Recital 128

In line with the commonly established notion of substantial modification for products regulated by Union harmonisation legislation, it is appropriate that whenever a change occurs which may affect the compliance of a high-risk AI system with this Regulation (e.g. change of operating system or software architecture), or when the intended purpose of the system changes, that AI system should be considered to be a new AI system which should undergo a new conformity assessment. However, changes occurring to the algorithm and the performance of AI systems which continue to ‘learn’ after being placed on the market or put into service, namely automatically adapting how functions are carried out, should not constitute a substantial modification, provided that those changes have been pre-determined by the provider and assessed at the moment of the conformity assessment.

Zo­bacz ofi­cjal­ny tekst praw­ny w EUR-​Lex

Po­trze­bu­jesz po­mo­cy w po­ru­sza­niu się po AI Act?

Kla­de­ro Ci po­mo­że.

Skon­tak­tuj się

Kla­de­ro — part­ner w prak­tycz­nym wdra­ża­niu AI

Kla­de­ro po­ma­ga or­ga­ni­za­cjom prze­kształ­cać moż­li­wo­ści AI w uży­tecz­ne sys­te­my, od­po­wie­dzial­ne work­flow oraz wie­dzę po­trzeb­ną do ich spraw­nej ob­słu­gi.
Ofe­ru­je­my róż­no­rod­ne pro­duk­ty i usłu­gi — od roz­wo­ju i in­te­gra­cji AI po przy­go­to­wa­nie do AI Act oraz prak­tycz­ne szko­le­nia. Po­roz­ma­wiaj z nami, aby do­wie­dzieć się wię­cej.