Recital 128

In line with the commonly established notion of substantial modification for products regulated by Union harmonisation legislation, it is appropriate that whenever a change occurs which may affect the compliance of a high-risk AI system with this Regulation (e.g. change of operating system or software architecture), or when the intended purpose of the system changes, that AI system should be considered to be a new AI system which should undergo a new conformity assessment. However, changes occurring to the algorithm and the performance of AI systems which continue to ‘learn’ after being placed on the market or put into service, namely automatically adapting how functions are carried out, should not constitute a substantial modification, provided that those changes have been pre-determined by the provider and assessed at the moment of the conformity assessment.

Con­sul­tați tex­tul ju­ri­dic ofi­ci­al pe EUR-​Lex

Aveți ne­vo­ie de aju­tor pen­tru a na­vi­ga AI Act?

Kla­de­ro vă poate ajuta.

Contactați-​ne

Kla­de­ro — par­te­ne­rul pen­tru adop­ta­rea prac­ti­că a AI

Kla­de­ro ajută or­ga­ni­za­ți­i­le să trans­for­me oport­u­ni­tă­ți­le AI în sis­te­me utile, flu­xuri de lucru res­pon­sa­bi­le și cu­noș­tin­țe­le ne­ce­sa­re pen­tru a le opera efi­cient.
Ofe­rim o gamă va­ri­a­tă de pro­du­se și ser­vi­cii, de la dezvol­ta­re și in­te­gra­re AI la pre­gă­ti­rea pen­tru AI Act și trai­ning prac­tic. Dis­cu­tați cu noi pen­tru a afla mai multe.